Monday, March 31, 2025

Yogeshwar Dutt's Dig Vinesh Phogat Over Haryana Government Benefits

Olympic medallist Yogeshwar Dutt took a jibe at former wrestler-turned-politician Vinesh Phogat for "seeking benefits" from the Bharatiya Janata Party-led Haryana government after fiercely opposing the BJP during the wrestler's protests. Notably, the Nayab Singh Saini-led Haryana government is set to extend benefits to Vinesh, equivalent to an Olympics silver medallist. "Time is very powerful. Those who used to talk of throwing prize money at the government's face are now begging for money in the Vidhan Sabha," Yogeshwar stated in a post on X.

Vinesh was among the top wrestlers who led the protest against former Wrestling Federation of India chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh over accusations of sexual harassment.

During the peak of the protest, Vinesh Phogat, Sakshi Malik and Bajrang Punia threatened to throw away their medals into the river.

Haryana CM Nayab Singh Saini, last week, confirmed that the former wrestler is entitled to a cash reward, a Group-A job or benefits under Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran, Urban Development Authority.

"I have said this earlier also that Vinesh is the daughter of Haryana, and we will not let her honour be diminished," he said.

"As per the silver medal category, athletes are entitled to three types of benefits: a cash reward, a Group A job, or benefits under HSVP (Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran, Urban Development Authority). The decision has been taken in the cabinet meeting over this...We have left this decision to Vinesh to choose which of the three benefits she wants to avail," CM Saini added.

Vinesh switched to politics after announcing her retirement from wrestling a short while after she was disqualified from the Paris Olympic Games.

In her 50-kg category weigh-in, she was found overweight by about 100 gm before the final. Vinesh was set to play for the gold medal in the final against the United States' Sarah Ann Hildebrandt.

After joining the Congress party last year, Vinesh contested the Haryana assembly elections and is currently serving as an MLA from Julana.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)



from NDTV News- Topstories https://ift.tt/Ifz34jE

Sunday, March 30, 2025

IPL 2025 Live: SRH Eye Another Run-Fest vs DC After LSG Setback

Delhi Capitals vs Sunrisers Hyderabad IPL 2025, Live Updates: Delhi Capitals are ready to host the fiery Sunrisers Hyderabad in Visakhapatnam for their next IPL 2025 match on Sunday. SRH, known for their powerful batting performances, began their campaign with a victory against Rajasthan Royals. However, they fumbled in their second match against Lucknow Super Giants. DC, on the other hand, claimed a thrilling one-wicket win over LSG in their opening match. In that game, batter Ashutosh Sharma stood like a lone warrior and propelled his side to victory in the last over. In this match, both the teams will be eager to earn the crucial two points. (Live Scorecard)

IPL 2025 Live Updates: Delhi Capitals vs Sunrisers Hyderabad Live Score



from NDTV News- Topstories https://ift.tt/FmBh8sC

Saturday, March 29, 2025

Lahore-Born NZ Debutant Breaks India Star's All-Time Record With Blitz vs Pak

New Zealand all-rounder Muhammad Abbas on Saturday shattered a huge record during the 1st ODI against Pakistan at the McLean Park in Napier. On debut against the country of his birth, Abbas struck 52, setting a world record for the fastest half-century on debut when he reached 50 off the 24th ball he faced. Abbas, who was born in Lahore, surpassed the previous best of Indian all-rounder Krunal Pandya, who had scored a fifty in 26 balls on his ODI debut.

Meanwhile, New Zealand won the series-opener to take a 1-0 lead in the three-match series. After being put into bat, the Kiwis, led by Mark Chapman's second ODI century, posted 344/9 in 50 overs at the McLean Park.

Chapman inflicted misery upon his favourite opponents once more, slamming a career-best 132 off 111 balls. A 199-run stand for the fourth wicket between him and Daryl Mitchell revived New Zealand's after the Pakistan bowlers did well to reduce them to 3/50.

Mitchell slammed 76 off 84 balls, before Abbas' blitz steered New Zealand close to 350. For the visitors, Akif Javed claimed 2-55 on his international debut, but the best figures were recorded by part-time seamer Irfan Khan, who took 3-51 off five expensive overs at the death.

In reply, Pakistan looked on track at 249-3 after half-centuries from the recalled Babar Azam and vice-captain Salman Ali Agha. Babar top-scored for Pakistan with 78 off 83 balls, but it was his dismissal that sparked a batting collapse.

The visitors lost seven wickets in the space of 22 runs, including Babar and Salam (58 off 48). Nathan Smith took 4/60.

"The way we started second innings, we went with good intent. When you are near the chase, pressure increases, three-four overs changed the momentum. Pitch was not good early on, difficult to bat on...Chapman played fantastically and put good runs. We need to improve more and take benefit of the toss. We had some new guys in the middle order and it's difficult because they are playing in challenging conditions," Pakistan captain Mohammad Rizwan said after the match.

"I think it was a great game of ODI cricket, lots of ebbs and flows. You can apply some T20 skills that the young players are learning quickly. It's great to see ODI cricket still alive I guess. (on bowling main quicks early on) You just try use your resources as best as you can, fortunately it paid off. You roll the dice and luckily it came off for me today. (on Abbas) it's a great sign for domestic cricket that guys coming in and stepping up and playing the way they play in domestic cricket. To stay in the game, keep fighting, that New Zealand spirit and it's what we re all about," Kiwi skipper Michael Bracewell added.

(With AFP Inputs)



from NDTV News- Topstories https://ift.tt/BHPlK3I

Friday, March 28, 2025

'Yeshu Yeshu Prophet' Bajinder Singh Found Guilty In 2018 Rape Case

Punjab's self-styled Christian pastor Bajinder Singh, who is popularly known as 'Yeshu Yeshu prophet', was on Friday convicted in a 2018 rape case.

In 2018, the 42-year-old was arrested on charges of raping a woman from Punjab's Zirakpur, after luring her on the pretext of offering assistance to travel abroad.

The quantum of sentence will be announced on April 1. 

Six people have been acquitted in the case. 

Singh is not new to controversies. 

Recently, a video of Singh assaulting a man and a woman in his office surfaced on social media. In the clip, he is seen throwing objects and slapping people in his office. He first slaps the man repeatedly. He then starts arguing with the woman before throwing a book-like object at her and slapping her. 

On February 28, the self-styled pastor was charged for allegedly sexually harassing a 22-year-old woman.

In her complaint, the woman alleged that she, along with her parents, started visiting Singh's church in October 2017. The pastor took her mobile phone number and started sending text messages, she alleged, adding that she did not tell her parents about it as she was afraid of Singh.

From 2022, the pastor allegedly made her sit alone in a cabin in the church on Sundays. When she would be alone, the pastor would allegedly hug her and touch her inappropriately. The survivor also alleged that the pastor had threatened to get her and her family members eliminated if she got a complaint lodged against him.

In 2022, Singh was accused of taking money from a Delhi family for treating their daughter for her illness, but she could not be saved. 

In 2023, the income-tax department raided his premises.

Born into a Jat family in Haryana, Singh says he converted to Christianity more than 10 years ago. He runs churches in Jalandhar and Mohali. He has a significant following on social media.



from NDTV News- Topstories https://ift.tt/10oJ458

"India Ready To Offer Assistance": PM Modi On Myanmar, Thailand Earthquake

India stands ready to offer all assistance to Myanmar and Thailand, said Prime Minister Narendra Modi after a powerful earthquake left dozens dead and buildings collapsed in the two East Asian countries earlier in the day. The tremors were felt in several Indian cities as well, including Kolkata and Imphal.

In a post on X (formerly Twitter), PM Modi said that India is ready to offer all possible assistance.

"Concerned by the situation in the wake of the Earthquake in Myanmar and Thailand. Praying for the safety and wellbeing of everyone. India stands ready to offer all possible assistance. In this regard, asked our authorities to be on standby. Also asked the MEA to remain in touch with the Governments of Myanmar and Thailand," he wrote.

A 7.7 magnitude earthquake, and an aftershock of 6.8, hit central Myanmar at 12.50pm (local time) Friday. The epicentre was 16km northwest of the city of Sagaing, and at a depth of 10km, the United States Geological Survey said. There are reports of casualties, but no tsunami warning has been issued.

A viral video shows an under-construction skyscraper in Bangkok's Chatuchak neighbourhood collapsing. According to reports, 43 workers are trapped amid the debris.



from NDTV News- Topstories https://ift.tt/Xom6gv1

Thursday, March 27, 2025

NDTV Explains: Trump's 25% Auto Tariffs. What Are They, Who Is Affected?

US President Donald Trump's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff on imported automobiles and auto parts - and the 25 per cent levy on steel and aluminium imports announced two weeks ago - mark a significant escalation in a global trade war brewing since he took oath in January.

The auto tariffs will come into effect on April 2 and those on auto parts a month later, on May 3.

A White House factsheet said the new tariffs will apply to imported passenger vehicles (i.e., sedans, SUVs, crossovers, minivans, and cargo vans) and light trucks, as well as parts like engines, transmissions, and powertrain and electrical components.

A significant aside is that there will be no exemption for Elon Musk's Tesla.

"... what we're going to be do is (placing) a 25 per cent tariff on all cars that are not made in the United States... if they're made in the United States, it's absolutely no tariff," Trump declared.

These tariffs, he claimed, would lead to "tremendous growth" for the industry in America and a sharp increase in jobs and investment, claims that fuelled his re-election campaign last year.

Analysts disagree.

They believe it will lead to a temporary paralysis, affecting not just output and revenue for a cash-strapped government but also risk US jobs and, in addition, further strain ties with the rest of the world.

Trump's Auto Tariffs Mean...

Car prices in the US - which imported nearly half of the 16 million sold last year, worth around $240 billion - will skyrocket, quickly, within two weeks, and sharply, by thousands of dollars.

The tariff will also apply to cars 'assembled in the US'; i.e., vehicles put together in American factories with components manufactured elsewhere and then imported into the country.

And, to round it off, the tariffs could even affect cars 'made in the US' because, as CNN pointed out, there really isn't an 'all-American' car - which is what Trump wants and hopes his tariffs will force into being - since auto manufacturers in the US rely on parts from Mexico and Canada.

For decades, the US auto industry - backed by a free trade agreement - has been able to treat the three countries as one, moving cars and auto parts freely between each other.

This means manufacturers could set up factories in Mexico, for example, build engines and transmissions there and then ship them to a factory in the US, for no additional cost.

That, though, could change after Trump begins taxing auto parts and, specifically, reviewing deals for free movement of these goods, which the BBC estimates is worth billions daily.

And then, don't forget the 25 per cent levy on steel and aluminium, both used in manufacturing cars, will also lead to an increase in prices.

Overall, experts believe manufacturing costs could jump by $3,500 to $12,000 per car, leading to a fall in demand and, consequently, possible lay-offs, even in US factories to offset that drop.

According to the US Labour Department, over a million people work in building cars in that country and nearly a third work in auto assembly plants. It is these jobs - around half of which are not unionised - that will most likely be the first to go, as experts predict, once the tariffs hit.

Trump's Auto Tariffs Will Affect...

Pretty much every foreign car manufacturer exporting cars, or auto parts, to the US, including big-hitters like Toyota (the world's largest) and Honda, and those from the European Union.

Retaliation isn't forthcoming just yet, with other countries perhaps waiting and watching to see if Trump, as he has in the past, rolls back his announcements.

They have, however, condemned the President's decision. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen underlined her belief that tariffs "are bad for businesses, worse for consumers" and warned it will affect "deeply integrated supply chains" worldwide.

Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has said his government is working on "appropriate measures", pointing out his country has made "significant investments" in the US.

And Canada's Mark Carney called it a "direct attack" on his country and the car industry.

The India Impact

It will also affect Indian manufacturers; shares of Tata Motors, for example, plummeted six per cent early Thursday morning. The company owns the Jaguar Land Rover brand for which the US is a key market. In 2024 over 20 per cent of its total sales were from the United States.

Auto component manufacturers like Samvardhana Motherson could also be hit.

The Indian auto industry is not as exposed to the American market as those from other Asian countries - like Japan, China, and South Korea - or the EU, but there is still cause for concern.

Last year Indian companies exported over $2 billion worth of auto parts to the US.

There is a flip side, though, as far as India is concerned. Passenger car exports, for example, are insignificant at $8.9 million last year and given Indian companies focus on controlling costs, its car prices could be appealing to the American market even with the 25 per cent tariff added.



from NDTV News- Topstories https://ift.tt/hvG3x7S

Wednesday, March 26, 2025

Opinion: Can A 'Technocrat' Fix All That's Wrong With BJP In Kerala?

On June 9, 2024, as the Modi 3.0 government was set to swear in, Rajeev Chandrasekhar came up with a cryptic tweet: “Today, curtains down on my 18-year stint of public service, of which three years I had the privilege of serving with PM Narendra Modiji's Team Modi 2.0. I certainly didn't wish to end my 18 years of public service as a candidate who lost an election, but that's how it has turned out”. The tweet was deleted after a day, and the amended version conveniently laid the blame for the confusion on an “intern”.

It was an emotional response, a mark of Chandrasekhar's utter disappointment with not finding a place in Modi 3.0. It also signified how the 'technocrat' was not a run-of-the-mill politician who believed in rehearsed or curated responses.

Less than a year since then, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) high command has now sprung a surprise by naming Chandrasekhar as its new Kerala state president.

A Surprise Choice

By no means was Rajeev Chandrasekhar the frontrunner. Incumbent K. Surendran, who overstayed his term by two years, was tipped to get another year's extension, until the assembly elections in the state in 2026. There were other contenders too, such as firebrand Sobha Surendran and veteran MT Ramesh. Even conventional wisdom suggested that social engineering compulsions would go against Chandrasekhar, a Nair hailing from Thrissur. With the two Malayalis in Modi's third ministry being a Nair and a Syrian Christian—Suresh Gopi and George Kurian—an Ezhava/Hindu OBC candidate would've been the more practical option.

But the high command had enough reasons to pick Chandrasekhar. The BJP in Kerala is a divided house with multiple factions, and none of the frontrunners would have been able to function smoothly on account of internal dissension. Even K. Surendran's five-year term was marred by friction with the PK Krishnadas-led faction, as well as his running feud with Sobha Surendran.

The BJP leadership reckons that Rajeev Chandrasekhar can carry all the factions together. He is not a natural politician, but the central leadership deems that this very characteristic will become Chandrasekhar's USP. It is very much a repetition of the 'K. Annamalai' experiment in Tamil Nadu.

Acceptable To All

True, Chandrasekhar's acceptability cuts across factions. But there are various other considerations at play. For all the gains it made elsewhere, the BJP has hardly had any electoral impact in Kerala, despite a steady rise in vote share. Even after faring reasonably well in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, cornering nearly 20% votes and Suresh Gopi's win from Thrissur, it did badly in the Palakkad by-election last November.

That loss probably put paid to Surendran's hopes to stay on until the assembly polls, as he had turned the issue into a battle of prestige. The central leadership also cannot quite understand why the BJP does so poorly in a state where the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has the second-largest network of shakhas (branches) in the country. For long, the RSS in Kerala had been deeply involved in the functioning of the state BJP, though the party's ideological mentor has taken a backseat in recent times. This was meant to afford more autonomy to the state party president, but it ultimately culminated in RSS organising secretary K. Subash's resignation, with the Sangh not naming a replacement in his stead for an extended period. Now, Rajeev Chandrasekhar's appointment is likely to be followed by the RSS naming an organising secretary to assist the new president in his functioning.

The last time the high command named an out-of-the-box candidate as state president was in the run-up to the 2016 assembly polls, when veteran Sangh leader Kummanam Rajasekharan, whose hardliner image and association with the Nilakkal protests of 1982 had proved to be a baggage for the party in the past. 

Courting The Middle-Class

The central leadership also believes that Chandrasekhar can cater to sections of Kerala's aspirational middle class that are yearning for change and are unhappy with both the ruling Left government and the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF). Since Chandrasekhar doesn't fit the mould of a regular politician, he may be able to connect better with this class and some increasingly ‘apolitical' sections of voters that support, say, a Shashi Tharoor. In many ways in fact, it was the spirited contest that he put in against Tharoor in the Lok Sabha election in Thiruvananthapuram, despite being a late entrant, that may have propelled Chandrasekhar to the coveted position today. Giving a tough fight to Tharoor, a lot of people were left wondering whether Chandrasekhar could have emerged victorious had he been pencilled in sooner. “Ini Karyam Nadakkum” (‘Now things will move') was Chandrasekhar's campaign slogan.

A Long Journey

This may well be called Chandrasekhar's second coming in Kerala politics. Contrary to what many may believe, the contest in Thiruvananthapuram wasn't his initiation in state politics, even if he was based in Bengaluru until then. Much before that, he had been a key mediator for getting the Bharat Dharma Jana Sena (BDJS), affiliated to the Ezhava community outfit Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam (SNDP), to join the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) in 2016. That is when Chandrasekhar was named the NDA's vice-chairman for Kerala, despite being a Rajya Sabha MP from Karnataka. 

Now, he may be expected to act as a bridge to the Christian clergy and cater to their grievances. The Christian community in Kerala has traditionally stood with the Congress, although cracks have begun to appear in recent times. Chandrasekhar may be expected to utilise issues such as the controversy surrounding the Munambam suburb of Ernakulam, where some 600 LChristian and Hindu families are protesting against the Waqf Board's claim over the area. Notably, Chandrasekhar was a key figure in getting veteran leader PC George to merge his splinter party with the BJP. Shone George, the latter's son, is also expected to emerge as an important leader during Chandrasekhar's term.

Media Man

It would also be remiss not to mention Chandrasekhar's ownership of Asianet News, which has consistently topped BARC (Broadcast Audience Research Council) ratings for Malayalam news channels. He is the majority shareholder of the news channel through the holding company Jupiter Capital. 

While some BJP leaders think that with the channel maintaining an independent editorial line Chandrasekhar's business interests may backfire on him, that could be a thin reading of the situation. This view got amplified recently when he had to tweet an apology on account of the channel's alleged slighting of the Maha Kumbh on a news show. The uber-enthusiastic coverage of Chandrasekhar's appointment as state BJP president was also duly noted by its viewers, sparking discussions whether it portended a change of ideology.

However, being the sharp businessman he is, Chandrasekhar may well understand that getting the channel to adopt a pro-BJP line could be counterproductive until the political climate in the state turns in favour of the party. He can always choose to intervene whenever he deems fit. In any case, as a politician, owning a channel has its perks.

Crossing The Threshold

As state BJP president, Chandrasekhar will be expected to adopt a hands-on approach to organisational affairs. The three-time Rajya Sabha MP is known to be short-tempered and will have to be at his diplomatic best while dealing with veteran state leaders. He will also be expected not to resort to communal statements—as he has sometimes done in the past—and rise above them to make a difference.

On the other hand, the leader may also have to navigate the mistakes perpetuated by his predecessors. Malayalis, like any other populace, are a proud people. The ‘Kerala-bashing' that state BJP leaders frequently resort to is one of the many reasons the party has failed to make much headway in the state. 

Chandrasekhar has his task cut out: turn the BJP from an also-ran to a winning horse in Kerala. If the saffron party can manage to get a quarter of the total vote share—it'll need to add just five more percentage points to its current tally—it will have established itself as a serious player in Kerala. 

(Anand Kochukudy is a senior journalist and columnist)

Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author



from NDTV News- Topstories https://ift.tt/4jeFx80

Tata Group Now Tesla's Global Supplier, Eyes Role In India Expansion: Report

Multinational conglomerate Tata Group has reportedly become a global supplier of billionaire Elon Musk's electric vehicle (EV) company Tesla. Several Tata firms, including Tata Technologies, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Tata AutoComp, and Tata Electronics, are now part of Tesla's supply chain, according to a report by The Economic Times (ET).

Per the report, these Tata companies have already signed global agreements with the automaker as essential partners and are providing crucial components and services to Tesla, which represents approximately half of the global automotive industry's market value. 

These firms contributed to the approximately $ 2 billion worth of Indian supplies-- including castings, forgings, electronics, and fabrication parts-- to the American automaker in FY24.  With the EV maker looking to diversify its supply chain, its sourcing from India is expected to increase.

The Tata group is now positioning itself for expanded opportunities and growing further, especially if Tesla sets up a manufacturing unit in India. Billionaire Musk's company has also initiated conversations with existing Indian suppliers about the possibility of establishing facilities near their manufacturing centres to enhance the supply ecosystem, the ET report said.

"Tesla is, in a way, readying the supplier base in India...We are very sure that once Tesla starts manufacturing here, Indian suppliers will benefit from sourcing opportunities," a top industry source told ET, requesting anonymity.

The report said that Tesla's Senior procurement executives have been meeting with numerous current suppliers about manufacturing specific components.

Tesla's India Expansion Plans In India

Currently, Tesla is evaluating manufacturing opportunities in India and is closely monitoring government incentives, tax benefits, and potential duty waivers before making a final decision. While the EV maker has not confirmed its manufacturing plans, reports indicate that it is in talks with several states, including Rajasthan, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, and Telangana, to explore options for setting up a production facility. 

If Tesla moves ahead with its India plans, Tata's role in its supply chain could grow even further. The ET report said the American company has strict non-disclosure agreements with its suppliers, which prevent them from revealing details about their contributions.

However, the sources told ET that Tesla also intends to procure various components from suppliers outside China and Taiwan, including wiring harnesses, electric motors, gearboxes, forged components, castings, sheet metal, sophisticated electronics, suspension systems, electric powertrains, and ball and ceramic bearings. 

Tata Group's Supplies To Tesla

Tata AutoComp provides specialised EV engineering products.

Tata Technologies delivers comprehensive product lifecycle management services. 

TCS supplies circuit-board technologies.

Tata Electronics provides chips.

The financial daily reported that while these companies within the Tata ecosystem maintain their current global supply arrangements, their future strategic decisions may be influenced by Tesla's ultimate decision regarding local manufacturing or contract manufacturing for the Indian market.

The American EV maker has established partnerships with numerous Indian manufacturers, including prominent names such as Samvardhana Motherson, Suprajit Engineering, Sona BLW Precision Forgings, Varroc Engineering, Bharat Forge, and Sandhar Technologies, for sourcing vital components, but it is likely to source essential vehicle control components from Tata Electronics, including printed circuit board assemblies for Tesla's battery management systems, motor controller units and door control mechanism, the report said. 



from NDTV News- Topstories https://ift.tt/1Ufj0cZ

Tuesday, March 25, 2025

Big Leak: Journalist Recounts How He Knew When US Would Drop Bombs On Yemen

The United States witnessed one of the most shocking national security indiscretions in years when a journalist was inadvertently added to a group chat in which Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Vice President JD Vance and other top officials discussed upcoming strikes against Yemen's Houthi rebels. 

Though the strike was announced by President Donald Trump on March 15, The Atlantic magazine's editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg claimed that he had hours of advance notice via the group chat on Signal, an encrypted messaging app. 

"The message thread that was reported (by Goldberg) appears to be authentic, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain," National Security Council spokesman Brian Hughes said.

Timeline Of Leaked Chats

Goldberg wrote that he received a connection request on Signal from a user identified as Michael Waltz on March 11. Signal is an open-source encrypted messaging service popular with journalists and others who seek more privacy than other text-messaging services are capable of delivering.

The journalist said had doubts about the identity of the sender but accepted the request assuming the sender was National Security Advisor Mike Waltz. 

According to Goldberg, he was added to the group chat two days earlier and received messages from other top government officials designating representatives who would work on the issue.

On March 14, a person identified as Vance expressed doubts about carrying out the strikes, saying he hated "bailing Europe out again," as countries there were more affected by Houthi attacks on shipping than the United States.

Goldberg wrote that Hegseth sent information on the strikes, including "targets, weapons the US would be deploying, and attack sequencing," to the group chat at 11:44 a.m, around two hours before the attack.

"According to the lengthy Hegseth text, the first detonations in Yemen would be felt two hours hence, at 1:45 pm Eastern time," Goldberg wrote -- a timeline that was borne out on the ground in Yemen.

Group chat contributors identified as National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and Hegseth both sent messages arguing only Washington had the capability to carry out the strikes, with the latter official saying he shared Vance's "loathing of European free-loading. It's PATHETIC."

And a person identified as "S M" -- possibly Trump advisor Stephen Miller -- argued that "if the US successfully restores freedom of navigation at great cost there needs to be some further economic gain extracted in return."

The leak could have been highly damaging if Goldberg had publicized details of the plan in advance, but he did not do so even after the fact.

Pete Hegseth Slams Goldberg

As he spoke to reporters Monday Hegseth dodged questions about the leak, in which highly sensitive material was not only shared with a reporter but also on a commercial app rather than in secure military channels reserved for such communications.

The former Fox News host with no experience running a huge organization like the Pentagon, took no responsibility for the security breach as he spoke to reporters late Monday.

He instead attacked Goldberg and insisted that "nobody was texting war plans," despite the White House confirming the breach.

Meanwhile, the White House said President Trump "continues to have the utmost confidence in his national security team," after the US president earlier said he did not "know anything about" the issue.

Houthi Attacks

The Houthi rebels, who have controlled much of Yemen for more than a decade, are part of the "axis of resistance" of pro-Iran groups staunchly opposed to Israel and the United States.

They have launched scores of drone and missile attacks at ships passing Yemen in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden during the Gaza war, saying they were carried out in solidarity with Palestinians.

The Houthis' campaign crippled the vital route, which normally carries about 12 per cent of world shipping traffic, forcing many companies into a costly detour around the tip of southern Africa.

The US began targeting the Houthis in response under the previous administration of president Joe Biden, and has launched repeated rounds of strikes on Houthi targets, some with British support.

Trump has vowed to "use overwhelming lethal force until we have achieved our objective," citing the Houthis' threats against Red Sea shipping, and US strikes have continued over the past 10 days.
 



from NDTV News- Topstories https://ift.tt/VpaNngo

Depleting Soil Health: The Price of Growing Water-Guzzling Crops

"Mere desh ki dharti sona ugle, ugle heere moti..." the popular 1967 Bollywood song comparing India's nutrient-rich soil to gold, diamonds and pearls might now be a thing of the past, especially in Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and the desert state of Rajasthan.

Farmers in these three states have devoted over half of their land to growing thirsty crops, including rice, wheat, and onion. These crops not only drink up more water but suck up even more nutrients.

A six-month investigation into understanding the impact of growing water-guzzling crops revealed that the top three states primarily growing water-intensive crops have depleted groundwater levels and soil nutrition, adding to the cost of health.

Soil samples collected from Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and Rajasthan were found to be severely lacking both macro and micronutrients, especially nitrogen, potassium, iron and sulphur. One in five samples reported sulphur deficiency compared to one in 10 in states focusing on non-water-intensive crops.

Not just this, nearly nine in 10 soil samples in the top three states growing water-intensive staple food crops showed nitrogen deficiency.

The absence of nutrients in the soil results in less nutritious food crops which in turn have a domino effect on your health. While you may eat vegetables and fruits thinking they are rich in essential proteins, vitamins and minerals, they might be lacking all or some of them because of the depleted soil.

In this three-part series, we explore the impact of cultivating water-guzzling crops on groundwater use, soil health, and potentially human well-being. In the first part of the three-part series, we explored the impact on groundwater. It can be read here. In this second part, we look at the health of the soil and the food grown on it.

States dependent on water-intensive crops have poorer soil health

A comparison of states growing water-intensive crops versus those growing non-water-intensive crops reveals a striking difference in soil health. The top three states - Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and Rajasthan - with the highest area share devoted to water-intensive crops have significantly lower levels of essential nutrients in soil compared to those growing non-water-intensive crops - Jharkhand, Odisha and Tripura. Here are the key findings:

  • On average, nine in 10 soil samples in water-intensive crop-growing states were reported to have non-optimal nitrogen, a key nutrient for plants. Whereas, this figure was six in 10 in non-water-intensive crop-growing states.
  • Similar levels of phosphorus deficiency were reported in two groups of states - 28.03 per cent in water-intensive crop growing states compared to 24.68 per cent in non-water-intensive crop growing states.
  • States with a larger proportion of area under cultivation for water-intensive crops have twice the levels of potassium deficiency than states primarily growing non-water-intensive crops.

  • Sulphur deficiency was almost twice (20.60 per cent) as prevalent in states growing water-intensive crops compared to those focusing on non-water-intensive crops (11.09 per cent).
  • Iron deficiency was significantly higher in water-intensive crop states, with a 36 percentage point difference compared to non-water-intensive crop states, where iron deficiency levels were much lower.

"Intensive irrigation leads to soil salinisation, compaction and erosion, nutrient leaching, reduced microbial activity and waterlogging. Poor soil health leads to reduced crop yields, low-quality produce, and increased costs for farmers and low farm income," explains Dr Ashok Kumar, an agronomist, at the FAO.

Staple or non-staple, water-guzzling crops leave soil undernourished

Growing staple foods that require a lot of water appears to be even worse for the soil than growing other types of water-intensive crops.

Farmers in Tamil Nadu have devoted over half of their land under cultivation to water-intensive staple crops like rice, potatoes and millet. Farmers in Madhya Pradesh and Punjab have dedicated nearly half of their land to other water-guzzling staples.

On the other hand, Goa has the highest share of area under cultivation dedicated to water-intensive non-staple crops, using just over half of its agricultural land to grow crops like sweet potatoes, walnuts, nutmeg and oilseeds. Gujarat and Rajasthan follow with about a quarter of their land under cultivation for non-staple crops such as bananas, berries, nutmeg, and pepper.

The crop profile has a large influence on their current soil health.

Made with Flourish

Soil in the top three states growing water-intensive staple food crops was found to be more deficient in nitrogen and sulphur than those growing water-intensive non-staple crops. Nearly nine out of 10 soil samples showed nitrogen deficiency. Whereas, about one in four samples showed sulphur deficiency, as per the Soil Health Card 2023-24.

"When we give excess water to the soil, there is a chance of nutrient leaching and loss of nutrients, particularly mobile nutrients like nitrogen," explains Dr Ashok Kumar Patra, the 2022 Glinka World Soil Prize Winner. "Nitrogen is highly dynamic in the soil. Additionally, sandy soil has low nutrient retention," adds Dr Patra, an Emeritus Scientist & Former Director of ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil Science, Bhopal.

But these states fare slightly better on other key nutrients with a marginal difference in the proportion of soil samples reporting phosphorus, potassium and zinc deficiency. For instance, three in 10 samples showed phosphorous deficiency as compared to four in 10 samples from non-staple food crop growing states.

Similarly, 35 per cent of soil samples in states growing water-intensive staple crops showed zinc deficiency, which is lower than the 40 per cent in states growing water-intensive non-staple crops.

The chain reaction set off by water-intensive farming that leaches key nutrients from soil

Soil health depends on its physical, biological and chemical properties. Nitrogen, an element often washed away in the irrigation of thirsty plants, is key for soil fertility. This also impacts other key elements critical to soil health.

Soil in the top three states with the highest area under water-intensive crops was found to be extremely deficient in nitrogen, according to the Soil Health Card 2023-24.

99 per cent of the soil samples tested in Tamil Nadu and Rajasthan were found to have either low or high nitrogen levels. In Gujarat, eight in 10 soil samples reported non-optimal nitrogen.

"Nitrogen is present in both biological and mineral forms. At any time, if you have excess nitrogen somewhere, except biological, it escapes into the atmosphere as ammonia and gas," explains Ajai Pachori, Joint Director, Agriculture (Chemistry), Government of Rajasthan. He adds, "Secondly, mineral nitrogen, which we provide through fertilizer, can leach because of excessive water usage. It can leach beyond the roots and pollute water."

Denitrification is another process that causes nitrogen loss in waterlogged soil. "As water moves downward through the soil, nitrate easily travels with it, often sinking below the plant root zone. While phosphorus doesn't leach as much, other nutrients like sulphur, calcium, and magnesium are more likely to move downward with the water. Excessive irrigation can carry dissolved metals deeper into the soil as well."

Latest and Breaking News on NDTV

Mr Pachori recommends that one-third of the nitrogen requirement should come from organic material in the form of farmyard manure and compost. Three-fourth of the nitrogen requirement should be met by fertilisers - either urea or ammonium sulphate or DAP (Diammonium Phosphate).

However, as Dr Pachori said, farmers are using DAP more than required.

On average, eight in 10 samples in the three states had non-optimal potassium in the soil.

Nearly one-third of the soil samples in Tamil Nadu have non-optimal phosphorus. Four in 10 soil samples in Gujarat and one in 10 in Rajasthan had non-optimal phosphorus.

"States using more water for irrigation give higher yields and take up more nutrients from the soil," explains Dr Ashok Kumar Patra, 2022 Glinka World Soil Prize winner. "But if farmers don't add an equal amount of nutrients to the soil, there will be a nutrient deficiency," adds Dr Patra, an Emeritus Scientist & Former Director of ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil Science, Bhopal.

Excessive irrigation can lead to loss of nutrients from the soil, leaving it less fertile.

Since the soil in his field has a light texture, Kala Khan, a farmer residing in the Alwar district of Rajasthan has applied fertiliser like DAP and urea to fulfill the phosphorus and nitrogen requirements. Fellow farmer Bijendra Kumar often adds more urea to compensate for the water shortfall.

"A rise in the quantity of phosphorous results in micronutrient (zinc and iron) deficiency in soil. Phosphorous and zinc and iron have an antagonistic effect," Dr Pachori said.

Excessive DAP dries up the soil, reduces water-holding capacity, makes soil alkaline and destroys micro-organisms and bacteria in the soil, added SP Yadav, Agriculture Research Officer, Soil Testing Laboratory, Alwar, Rajasthan.

The three top water-intensive crop growing states have mixed results. In Rajasthan, over half of the soil samples showed deficiencies in both iron and zinc, while 8 per cent also displayed a lack of sulphur.

On the other hand, in Gujarat, one-fifth of the soil samples were found deficient in sulphur. 29 per cent of the soil samples had iron deficiency while 37 per cent had zinc deficiency.

One-third of the soil samples in Tamil Nadu reported sulphur deficiency. 40-45 per cent of the sample had iron and zinc deficiency, as per the Soil Health Card 2023-24.

Five years ago, Rajasthan's soil was more deficient in zinc. Now it is iron deficient. "It is because our department supplies zinc. Farmers too shell out some money and buy zinc supplements," said Mr Yadav.

The consequences of poor soil on plant health

Lack of soil nutrients directly impacts plant growth - both in terms of quality and quantity. Micronutrients iron and zinc act as catalysts and support various metabolic activities. "Iron and zinc deficiency in soil can lead to retarded growth, less production, and low quality of produce," said Ajai Pachori, Joint Director, Agriculture (Chemistry), Government of Rajasthan.

Zinc also helps plants in an uptake of nutrients like calcium and chlorophyll formation.

Sulphur, another micronutrient, aids in the growth of oilseeds and pulses. Sulphur deficiency in the soil can lead to protein deficiency in pulses, said SP Yadav.

"Let's say you grow pulses on soil lacking sulphur. The harvested crop will look like a regular pulse; when cooked, it will appear and taste like any other. However, it won't meet your protein needs, as the sulphur deficiency in the soil has caused it to lack essential protein," he explained.

Nitrogen, a macronutrient, plays a key role in plant germination. "The plant's body, which develops from the seed, is composed of nitrogen. The main role of nitrogen is to increase greenery, and plant growth," adds Mr Yadav.

Phosphorus, a co-macronutrient, helps develop roots and grain formation.

The job of potassium is to increase production quality and protect crops from diseases and pests.

"Soil health manifests directly with micronutrient deficiencies within the food items, which could be cereals, pulses, fruits and vegetables, etc," explains Dr Rajiv Tandon, Consultant Paediatrician and Executive Director, The Health Continuum. He adds, "And that eventually leads to the same low levels of minerals and vitamins in the people who eat that particular food item."

Restoring soil health

The bottom line is that states growing water-intensive crops have bad soil health. Thirsty crops take up more nutrients than less thirsty crops and vice versa. Therefore, sustainable farming practices play a vital role in maintaining and improving soil health.

Farmers are being taught to use fertilisers judiciously and apply farmyard manure to maintain soil health. Mr Yadav explained, "Farmers often have livestock, but don't utilize their manure effectively. Typically, it's spread on the soil, where it's exposed to pollution and extreme heat, causing it to dry out. When it rains, the nutrients are washed away, and the manure doesn't decompose properly, limiting its potential benefits. However, by digging a pit to store the manure, soil retains moisture throughout the year. Microorganisms can break it down more efficiently, transforming it into valuable vermicompost. This process enhances the soil's physical, chemical, and biological properties."

Latest and Breaking News on NDTV

There is a synergy between water and nutrients, opines Dr Ashok Kumar from FAO. "Crop rotation, such as alternating cereals with legumes, can enrich the soil with nitrogen for future crops. Similarly, rotating water-intensive crops with deep-rooted crops can help break compacted soil layers formed by the cultivation of water-intensive crops. On the other hand, shallow-rooted crops help prevent soil erosion. This will enhance soil structure and improve soil infiltration and retention," he adds.

As farmers dig deeper to irrigate their fields, they encounter saline water that isn't ideal for crops. "When saline water accumulates in the topsoil, it leads to soil salinity, which hampers germination. Let's say a seed germinates regardless of salinity, the plant's growth will be retarded. The roots won't develop properly, which affects the flowering and fruiting stages," added Mr Yadav.

To restore soil health, Dr Ashok Kumar suggests adopting sustainable irrigation practices such as micro-irrigation, monitoring soil moisture levels, and implementing crop rotation and diversification to maintain soil health.

"There are many ways to restore soil health in areas affected by intensive irrigation such as no-till farming, adding organic matter, planting cover crops, crop rotation, bioremediation and integrated nutrient management," he adds.

The article is part two of a three-part series on the impact of growing water-guzzling crops on groundwater, soil nutrition and health. In the first part, we looked at the depleting groundwater. It can be read here.

In the third part, we explore the link between soil nutrition and human health. Read the part three here.

Methodology:

This data story looks at the impact of growing water-intensive crops on groundwater, soil health and human health.

To begin with, the author looked at the "Mekonnen, M.M. and Hoekstra, A.Y. (2010) The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products" report to identify water-intensive crops in states across India. The author considered only blue water footprint data to know how much groundwater is being used to irrigate a crop, in a state. If a state uses more blue water than the national average to grow a certain crop, then the author considered the crop "water-intensive" in that state.

The author also looked at the "Area, Production & Yield - Reports" from 2013-2023 to calculate the proportion of area under cultivation of water-intensive or non-water-intensive crops in each state. The area, production and yield reports were taken from the official website of the Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare.

Following this methodology, the author identified three states with the highest proportion of area under cultivation for water-intensive crops and three states with the highest proportion of area under cultivation for non-water-intensive crops. They then looked at Soil Health Card data (2023-24) by the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. They focused on the status of macronutrients (N, P, K) and micronutrients (S, Fe, Zn) in the soil to see if the soil in states growing water-intensive crops is more deficient in essential nutrients.

The author also looked at the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) data specifically for the six states and analysed data for key health indicators - malnutrition and anaemia among children under five and women.

All supporting data and analysis can be accessed here.

The author travelled to Alwar district in Rajasthan and met farmers in different villages to understand their challenges.

(Reporting for this story was supported by the Environmental Data Journalism Academy- a program of Internews' Earth Journalism Network and Thibi.)



from NDTV News- Topstories https://ift.tt/I8geOa0

Monday, March 24, 2025

Comic's "Basic Common Sense" Post Over Shiv Sena's Mumbai Studio Rampage

Protesting against Shiv Sena workers' vandalism at Mumbai's Habitat studio, a popular comic has said it is not "Kunal Kamra's studio" and thousands of artists perform there. Abijit Ganguly has said damaging the studio over Kunal Kamra's remarks against Sena chief Eknath Shinde was like vandalising a residential complex because Kunal Kamra visited it once.

"Can people at least apply basic common sense and stop calling it Kunal Kamra's studio? It's a performing arts venue. A venue that doesn't have anything to do with Kamra. Thousand other artist(s) perform there. Even the biggest Kamra hater has to realise this is akin to Kamra appearing in your society tomorrow and people coming in and breaking down your whole society because he was there once," he said in a post on X.

Habitat studio is a preferred venue for stand-up comedy shows by popular comics. It made headlines last month too, when YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia made crass remarks at a roast show, India's Got Latent, shot at the studio.

Earlier today, the studio management said they had decided to shut the premises for now and pointed out that they are not responsible for the views of the artists performing on the premises.

"We are shocked, worried and extremely broken by the recent acts of vandalism targeting us. Artists are solely responsible for their views and creative choices. We have never been involved in the content performed by any Artist, but the recent events have made us rethink about how we get blamed and targeted every time almost like we are a proxy for the performer."

""We are shutting down till we figure out the best way to provide a platform for free expression without putting ourselves and our property in jeopardy. We invite all artists, audience and stakeholders to discuss and share their views freely and request your guidance so that we also respect the performers' rights," the studio said.

Earlier, the studio had said in a social media post that it was not involved in the making of Kunal Kamra's latest video and "does not endorse the views expressed by it". "We extend a sincere and heartfelt apology to all those hurt by this video," it said after a group of Sena workers entered the premises in Khar and damaged property to protest against the comic's remarks against Mr Shinde. Visuals showed Sena workers swinging chairs at cameras, lights and speakers at the studio.

In a show shot last month, Kunal Kamra targeted Mr Shinde with a parody version of 'Bholi Si Surat', a popular song from the 1997 blockbuster Dil To Pagal Hai. He used the 'gaddar' (traitor) jibe against the Shiv Sena leader, who led a rebellion against Uddhav Thackeray in 2022, bringing down his government and splitting the party. Multiple FIRs have been filed against the comic, including one based on a complaint by minister Pratap Sarnaik.



from NDTV News- Topstories https://ift.tt/b5Rta31

Sunday, March 23, 2025

Blog: Adolescence: Are You A 'Docile Body' Too

Good storytelling engages, but great storytelling enthralls. It doesn't simply entertain; it disarms, deceives, and leaves you spellbound, say, like the illusion of a veteran magician. You see the trick unfold, yet surrender willingly, captivated by the craft. That's the triumph of the pilot episode of Adolescence, the British crime drama miniseries that has emerged as an unexpected spring blockbuster for Netflix. Everyone seems to be talking about it, everyone seems to be moved by its gut-wrenching realism. “A technical masterclass,” they say, marveling at the audacity of an entire series captured in a single, continuous take. And then, there's the inevitable refrain—“That third episode? Peak television.” They're right. That third episode is a narrative feat (and we'll get there soon). But for now, let's talk about the opening hour. That first, searing plunge into a world that grips you by the collar.

The Noose Tightens

It's early morning. DI Luke Bascombe (Ashley Walters) and his team raid a house. They move with practised urgency. They are many. Armed, deliberate, prepared for the worst. The house is torn apart, every corner overturned. You assume they're after a fugitive, someone dangerous, someone capable of unspeakable harm. But then comes the shock. They're here for a boy. Jamie (Owen Cooper), 13 years old, arrested on suspicion of murder. The sight unsettles. You want to pause, to question. But the moment doesn't wait. Jamie crumbles as they lead him away. At the station, the machinery grinds on. Procedural questions. Strip searches. Blood samples. The sterile hum of officialdom. A chilling interrogation. And then it's revealed: he really did it. Jamie, just 13, is here for a reason. He's not a victim of some mistake or misunderstanding. He stabbed someone. Took a life. The words land heavily. 

This is not simply the opening of a show. It is the tightening of a noose. But while the revelation is startling, what truly unsettled me was something else entirely. The cold, mechanical rhythm of the characters' lives. Throughout the first episode, the way they speak, the way they move, every gesture feels calculated. Even in the face of brutality, there is no rupture; only the sterile hum of procedure. It's as if discipline has seeped into their very mannerisms. It's as if the supposed politeness isn't kindness; it's a polished form of control. Bascombe, his colleagues, the local solicitor, the sergeants, the nurse—all operate like cogs in a machine. Their words are measured, their actions devoid of warmth.  Even care, when offered, feels like protocol. There's really only the numbing precision of a system that demands compliance.

Latest and Breaking News on NDTV

While watching all of this, what struck me most was how these people had become docile bodies. A term coined by French philosopher Michel Foucault in his seminal work Discipline and Punish. He spoke of individuals molded by the quiet machinery of control, shaped into submission through the subtleties of discipline and surveillance. In modern societies, Foucault argued, power rarely announces itself with force. Instead, it seeps into the everyday: through routines, regulations, and the omnipresent gaze of authority. It demands not only obedience but internalisation. After all, then the body becomes a vessel of compliance, its movements measured, its desires restrained. Here, too, the characters are not simply participants in a system; they are its products. Their behaviour, their speech, even their notions of care, are dictated by the very structures that claim to uphold order. What remains is a hollowed-out humanity, where conformity is not just expected but inevitable.

Challenging Foucalt Himself

However, as the episode ends, this reading feels almost trivial: a passing thought, an unnecessary subtextual implication. The show, it seems, isn't primarily concerned with Foucault's complex notions. It is far too preoccupied with its own urgencies to dwell on the mechanics of docility. But then, it startles once more. In the episodes that follow, it keeps circling back to those very ideas. Each time in a different setting, with heightened stakes, sharper conflicts, and more layered resolutions. It's as if the show refuses to let go of the question, bending it to its will. It's as though the show urges us to chase the answers, daring us to plunge headlong into the unknown. And in doing so, it doesn't merely echo Foucault; it sometimes challenges him. It bends his theories, reshapes them, and casts them into the fractured mirror of contemporary society. 

If the first episode subtly explored the subjugation within the walls of a police station, the second shifts its gaze to a school. A space where docile bodies are not just maintained but conscientiously crafted. However, unlike the rigid confines of the station, the school is all about chaos. Here, Bascombe and DS Misha Frank (Faye Marsay) arrive seeking answers, yet find themselves confronted by something far more unsettling. Teachers wear their anxieties like second skins, students roam unchecked, smartphones capture every moment, and bullying thrives openly. The questions about the murder are met with ridicule. The students mock, dismiss, and toy with the detectives' authority. This is no orderly institution. The children are not the obedient figures Foucault spoke of—not yet, at least.

Discipline Is Control

But then, things suddenly change. A false fire alarm is heard, and, in an instant, discipline materialises. Without force, without resistance, bodies fall in line. The unruly become compliant. They are led to the grounds, organised into rows. It is here that Foucault's theories breathe afresh. Schools, he argued, are sites of regulation and subversion. Places where control is enforced not through visible chains, but through routine. The simple acts of standing in line, sitting still, or rehearsing drills are no accidents. They are rehearsals of obedience, performances of submission. And just like that, the illusion of chaos is shattered, revealing the order that was always waiting beneath. Much like the show's fixation with docility, which very much stays beneath the surface, until the third episode brings it surging forth. No longer subtle, no longer concealed, as if it had only been waiting to be seen. In fact, you barely notice when it shifts from the periphery to become one of the show's central thematic foundations.

Latest and Breaking News on NDTV

If the first episode was about who did it, and the second about why he did it, then the third asks a deeper question: what made him do it? This time, the setting shifts to a children's mental-health facility, yet another institution Foucault examined. A space designed to mold individuals, enforce conformity, and internalise discipline. But it's not just the walls of the facility that confine Jamie. The episode also interrogates the varied forces that shape his perceptions of masculinity and the opposite sex. The media he consumes, the influences he absorbs. Independent psychologist Briony (a terrific Erin Doherty) arrives to assess him. Their conversation begins on a deceptively light note, but the undercurrent of unease is quick to rise. Tension coils tightly, words become weapons, and what starts as a dialogue soon fractures into something far more volatile. The episode unfolds almost entirely within a single room, yet the space is anything but static. 

The Uneasy Undercurrents

Every exchange crackles with complexity. There are shifting sympathies, uneasy silences, unspoken truths. For the characters, the spectators and the makers, it's nothing less than a psychological tug-of-war. And by the time the final words are spoken, the show's thematic core stands bare, impossible to ignore. The episode begins with Briony being uneasy in the presence of an old guard. But by the end, it is really Jamie, a teenager, who unsettles her. His gaze disturbs, disarms, discourages. At moments, it borders on an assertion of power that tilts the room in his favour. This ties into something larger: docility entwined with patriarchy, the way women are conditioned to internalise the gaze, to self-discipline before they are disciplined. A body that resists, that refuses to be subdued, becomes a threat, and threats are often erased. Perhaps that is why the victim, Jamie's schoolmate, is never seen. Perhaps that is why, at a breaking point, Frank's frustration spills out: how the girl will be forgotten, how the story will always be about Jamie.

Through Jamie, the creators (Jack Thorne, Stephen Graham) interpret docility in its rawest form. His conversations with Briony uncover the isolation and bullying that defined his school life, showing how he stumbles into incel forums and the manosphere, where resentment festers and power is promised. Andrew Tate becomes his guiding light, and bit by bit, the world's misogyny molds him. He might view himself as reclaiming masculinity, but in reality, he is a docile body, subservient to the same heteronormative, misogynistic structures that claim to liberate him. And as Foucault argued long before this age of screens, technology only tightens the grip. The panopticon no longer needs prison walls. Now it thrives in algorithms, in likes and comments that surveil and shape without presence. Behavior shifts. Patterns form. Not because we are seen, but because we might be.

Home As A Prison?

It's this idea of watchfulness that begins to unsettle Jamie's parents in the final episode, which is also the most subversive and gut-wrenching of the lot. This time, the institution under scrutiny is not a school, a police station, or a mental-health facility. It is a home. And at its centre stands a family, crumbling under the burden of what they failed to see. We see Eddie (a devastating Stephen Graham) seething with rage, his fear spilling over into violence. In fact, in a moment of uncontrollable outrage, he nearly harms two teenagers. His voice echoes through the house, his shouts filling the air. He storms through rooms, arguing with his wife, clutching desperately at the illusion of protecting his daughter. But as the walls close in, a question remains: how much of Jamie's violence was inherited? Did his father's anger, his unchecked masculinity, seep into him like a second skin?

Latest and Breaking News on NDTV

Perhaps Eddie wonders the same. In the closing moments, he breaks down, consumed by the unbearable thought: where did I go wrong? His wife, in her own disbelief, wrestles with another question: how was Jamie always there, just across the room, yet so distant? Was it that they didn't watch him closely enough? Or perhaps, in his desperation not to become like his own father, Eddie became something else entirely. A father who looked without seeing. It's also the same realisation that hits Bascombe toward the end of the second episode. He finally begins to see his son, to realise that on any other given day, his son could very well be in Jamie's place.

It's only fitting that a show this precise and urgent ultimately turns its gaze on the act of watching itself. After all, surveillance lies at the heart of Foucault's ideas on docility. And it's only fitting that the show's form embodies this tension. The choice to shoot each episode in a single, unbroken take is more than an aesthetic decision; it is an assertion of control, a visual manifestation of the systems it critiques. In this act of watching, we become complicit. Cinema, too, is a panopticon, its subjects shifting under our gaze, influenced by the very act of being seen. And perhaps, like Jamie, we mistake watching for knowing, surveillance for control, as if to see something is to possess it.

(Anas Arif is a film writer and a media graduate from AJKMCRC, Jamia Millia Islamia)

Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author



from NDTV News- Topstories https://ift.tt/ozOrqRc

Saturday, March 22, 2025

'Never Said No Cash Found': Delhi Fire Chief's Clarification Amid Judge Row

Chief of Delhi Fire Services (DFS), Atul Garg on Friday denied reports attributing to him a statement claiming that no cash was found during firefighting operations at the residence of Delhi High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma.

Garg's clarification followed reports by some media outlets, including a news agency quoting him saying firefighters had not found any cash while dousing the flames at the judge's official residence.

In response to an inquiry from IANS, Garg refuted the claim, stating that he never told any media outlet that firefighters had reported no cash found at the scene. When asked why his name was being quoted in the reports, Garg replied, "I don't know why," adding that he had already sent a clarification to the media outlets carrying the statement.

According to a fire department report obtained by IANS, the fire was limited to domestic and stationery articles in a storeroom, and no casualties were involved.

Earlier, certain media outlets had reported that Garg stated, "firefighters found no cash during their operation to douse flames at the residence of Delhi High Court Justice Yashwant Varma." The firefighting team had informed the police after extinguishing the fire on Thursday night.

This development comes as the Supreme Court Collegium has launched an inquiry into the entire incident following allegations of a large sum of cash being discovered at the residence of Justice Varma during the fire incident on Thursday night.

The Collegium is also said to have recommended his transfer to the Allahabad High Court.

In response to the speculation, the Supreme Court issued a clarification stating that Justice Varma's transfer to the Allahabad High Court is not related to the alleged discovery of cash at his official residence. The court stressed that the transfer decision was made independently of the ongoing inquiry into the matter.

"There is misinformation and rumours being spread regarding the incident at the residence of Justice Yashwant Varma," the Supreme Court said in a press note, dismissing any connection between the transfer and the alleged cash recovery.

(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)



from NDTV News- Topstories https://ift.tt/xi07E6y

Putin Went To Church To Pray For Trump After Assassination Attempt

Donald Trump's top envoy Steve Witkoff has offered a rare glimpse into the unique dynamic between the US President and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin.

According to Witkoff, Putin prayed for Trump's well-being after the attempted assassination at a campaign rally last summer. This gesture was not only a demonstration of Putin's concern but also highlighted the friendship between the two leaders.

Witkoff shared this anecdote during an appearance on former Fox News host Tucker Carlson's podcast, recounting his second meeting with Putin. The Russian president had visited his local church, met with his priest, and prayed for Trump's recovery. 

"When the president was shot, he went to his local church and met with his priest and prayed for the president," Witkoff said of Putin.

Putin "had a friendship with him and he was praying for his friend," he explained. He added that when he told the same to Trump, he was "clearly touched."

This revelation comes after Trump was grazed by a bullet fired by 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks during a campaign rally near Butler, Pennsylvania. At the time, a Kremlin spokesperson blamed the shooting on Trump's political adversaries.

In another gesture of goodwill, Putin commissioned a "beautiful portrait" of Trump by a top Russian artist, which was gifted to Trump. This move underscores the cordial relationship between Putin and Trump, with the latter having expressed admiration for the Russian leader on multiple occasions. Trump has referred to Putin as a "genius" and "a strong leader," prompting criticism from those who accuse him of being soft on the Kremlin.

The dynamics between Putin and Trump have been subject to intense scrutiny, particularly given the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Earlier this week, the two leaders engaged in a two-hour phone call to discuss ending Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Trump described the conversation as "very good and productive," highlighting the ongoing efforts to resolve the conflict.
 



from NDTV News- Topstories https://ift.tt/38nxFXs

Friday, March 21, 2025

Young, Rich Indians Push Lamborghini, Mercedes-Maybach Sales

Lamborghini and Mercedes-Maybach plan to expand in India as a growing tribe of young, rich Indians splurge on super luxury cars, driving their sales to record levels.

Italian supercar maker Lamborghini, fresh from a year of record sales, is exploring a fourth showroom in India, while Mercedes-Maybach sees the country as a potential top-five market by sales, company executives said.

"India, for us, is an asset ... there is a huge potential for the future. There is the idea of having maybe a fourth dealership but this is still something in the early stages," Lamborghini's Stephan Winkelmann told reporters at a virtual roundtable.

The optimism is driven by "a change in generation" in the country with "momentum from younger customers", he said, adding that the average age of a Lamborghini buyer in India is below 40 years - making it the youngest market after China.

"You have a lot of startups in India which are very successful. You have very young, high net worth individuals which are stepping into this type of car. So this is positive for us," he said.

Rapid economic growth in India has wrought a fundamental shift in attitude towards luxury purchases among its younger generations that differs from their elders, who were more concerned with saving.

Executives at startups cashing out after record public listings and younger generations of a family business spending with less guilt are driving up sales of all things luxury - cars, watches, bags and even homes.

But luxury car sales in India make up just over 1% of the 4 million vehicles-a-year market, and super luxury cars are an even smaller percentage.

Lamborghini had its best year in India in 2024, selling 113 cars, up 10% on 2023. Winkelmann expects growth again this year, on the back of a strong order book lasting 18 months.

Its Urus SUV, which has a starting price tag of close to $500,000 before taxes, made up half its sales, with the rest coming from the Huracan and Revuelto sports cars.

Mercedes-Maybach achieved 145% growth in India in 2024, selling 500 of its super luxury cars priced upwards of $325,000 in a market where the average car costs about $15,000.

Daniel Lescow, head of Mercedes-Maybach, said India was already in its top 10 markets and had the potential to be in the top five, but the speed of growth would depend on how the luxury market develops.

"I'm convinced there's so much more potential ... so many opportunities here," Lescow told Reuters.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)



from NDTV News- Topstories https://ift.tt/Y1oxfc0

"Nuanced Understanding": US Intelligence, State Department Back Gabbard

The United States has released an official statement in which it has praised Intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard for her "nuanced understanding" of the Indo-Pacific region. The statement comes days after her visit to India, during which she held a meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

During her visit Ms Gabbard had spoken exclusively to NDTV World, where she spoke on several issues in the region, including the situation in Bangladesh. She had mentioned how there has been a rise in "persecution of minorities" in Bangladesh and mentioned how the mentality of an "Islamist Caliphate" stems from extremism and violence. The statement was rejected by Bangladesh, which termed it as "misleading".

WHAT TULSI GABBARD TOLD NDTV

In an exclusive interview to NDTV World, United States' Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, said, "The longtime unfortunate persecution, killing, and abuse of religious minorities like Hindus, Buddhists, Christians, and others has been a major area of concern for the US government and President Trump and his administration."

In her remarks she spoke about the ideology of an "Islamic Caliphate" and how extremist elements and terror groups globally aim for such an outcome. "The threat of Islamist terrorists and the global effort of different terror groups are routed in the same ideology and objective - which is to rule or govern with an Islamist Caliphate," she said, adding that "This obviously affects people of any other religion, other than the one that they find acceptable, and they chose to carry this out with terror and very violent ways and means."

Bangladesh's interim government had responded by saying, "This statement is both misleading and damaging to the image and reputation of Bangladesh, a nation whose traditional practice of Islam has been famously inclusive and peaceful and that has made remarkable strides in its fight against extremism and terrorism."

STATEMENT BY US INTELLIGENCE DEPARTMENT

"Having been born and raised in the Indo-Pacific region, DNI Gabbard brought a nuanced understanding of the area's crucial partnerships and complex challenges," a DNI statement said.

It added that Ms Gabbard also "explored opportunities to advance President Trump's America First policies across the Indo-Pacific region".

The US Intelligence chief held several key meetings during her visit to India, including one with members of the Five Eyes security alliance. The meeting was hosted by Indian National Security Adviser Ajit Doval, R&AW Chief Ravi Sinha, and Intelligence Bureau (IB) chief Tapan Deka.

She also had meetings with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh. "This visit highlights the decades-strong US-India relationship that is bolstered by the leadership of and friendship between Prime Minister Modi and President Donald Trump," the US DNI statement said, adding that "Gabbard's meetings in India focused on intelligence-sharing, defence, counter-terrorism, and transnational threats."

Ms Gabbard also attended the annual global multilateral conference Raisina Dialogue in Delhi where she gave a keynote address on Donald Trump's vision. "Securing peace through strength requires strong leadership with a clear-eyed and realistic understanding of global challenges and opportunities," she said.

US STATE DEPARTMENT BACKS GABBARD, BUT PRAISES BANGLADESH TOO

Besides the statement issued by the US Intelligence department, the US State Department also backed her, saying that the United States reiterates its stance on the protection of minority communities in Bangladesh. The State department spokesperson however, also praised the efforts taken by Bangladesh in recent times.

"We condemn any instances of violence or intolerance directed toward members of minority communities in any country and have welcomed measures taken by Bangladesh's interim government to ensure safety and security for all in Bangladesh. That's what we're watching. That's what we expect. And that will be what continues," spokesperson Tammy Bruce said.

Tulsi Gabbard was on her first multi-nation visit as the Director of National Intelligence, visiting Hawaii, Japan, Thailand, India, and France.
 



from NDTV News- Topstories https://ift.tt/4PAvQLM

Opinion: What RSS' Calls For 'Moderation' Really Tell Us

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak  Sangh (RSS) is celebrating 100 years since its inception—a remarkable journey for an organisation that was long considered untouchable and ridiculed by the intellectual class yet has not only survived, but thrived. 

The Congress, with its glorious legacy of members like Gandhi, Nehru, Patel, Tilak, and Bose, has fractured multiple times; the Socialists—once led by JP and Lohia—have become almost unrecognisable, splintering so often that their divisions are beyond count; even the Communists have seen splits, resulting in a proliferation of leftist parties. The RSS, in contrast, has had none of this. Even though it is not an intellectual movement, it has successfully developed a process—driven by patience and resilience—that has propelled it as a hegemonic force. If the Congress fails to course-correct, it won't be a surprise if the 21st century is seen as belonging to the RSS and Hindutva.

Keeping Up With The Times

The RSS has a remarkable ability to adapt to changing circumstances without losing its ideological foundation. Sure, it may have withdrawn certain chapters of Bunch of Thoughts or moderated some of Golwalkar's statements, but it has never compromised on its core ideology. After Gandhi's assassination and in the towering presence of Nehru and Indira Gandhi, the RSS—operating through the Jan Sangh and later the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)—avoided overt anti-Muslim rhetoric, instead engaging in the constitutional and parliamentary process. However, after Indira Gandhi's passing and Rajiv Gandhi's ascent, the RSS saw an opportunity to openly advance Hindutva through the Ram Mandir movement. It sidelined Atal Bihari Vajpayee, elevating hardliner LK Advani as the face of its agenda. Later, when coalition politics demanded a more moderate stance, Vajpayee was brought back, eventually serving as Prime Minister for six years.

By 2013, with the Congress deeply discredited and the conditions ripe for Hindutva's resurgence, the RSS preferred Narendra Modi to lead the BJP.

The last 10 years have been particularly fertile for the growth of Hindutva. The strength of the RSS should not be measured by the number of states the BJP has won, the offices and buildings it has constructed, or the growth of its shakhas and new members. Instead, its true strength is reflected in how widely the ideology of Hindutva has been accepted by a significant section of Hindus. Electoral victories and physical expansion are merely superficial indicators of success—temporary in nature. What is more fundamental and enduring is the exponential rise in Hindu consciousness and pride.

Hindu Consciousness

The RSS has successfully dismantled the earlier hesitation among Hindus towards openly embracing their identity. Not too long ago, many Hindus were reluctant to wear their religious identity on their sleeves, fearing that doing so would lead to accusations of communalism and a significant perception loss. The socio-political ecosystem was dominated by left-liberal thought, which discouraged overt religious identities. Religion was confined to the private sphere, and it was widely preached and practised that India, as a secular state, must maintain a clear separation between religion and politics.

However, that has changed in the last 10 years. Under the state's patronage, Hindu identity is worn more aggressively than ever, with competitive displays common. While a majority of upper-caste Hindus are fully aligned with Hindutva, sections of OBCs and Dalits have also joined this movement, shedding their reservations about asserting their Hindu identity. These are the ‘New Hindus'—a group whose idiom and language differ from those of traditional Hindus.

This socio-cultural metamorphosis carries an inherent flaw, however. Its foundation is built on hatred toward Muslims, which has left both a large section of Hindus—including many silent supporters of Hindutva—and Muslims wary of a disruptive present and a potentially challenging future. There is growing apprehension that if the current trajectory continues unchecked, it could lead to widespread disruptions.

A Dilemma

Ironically, while the RSS takes great pride in its mission to unite Hindus as a civilisational goal, this has also created fissures within. Hindus are now highly polarised. The aggressive rhetoric of BJP leaders, coupled with the active connivance of the state apparatus, has instilled fear and anxiety in a segment of the Hindu population.

It appears that the RSS leadership is aware of the dangers posed by the aggressive Hindutva embraced by the ‘New Hindus'. Since 2018, statements from RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat suggest an acknowledgement of this risk.

The Nagpur Violence

In this context, the statement by senior RSS functionary Sunil Ambekar—that Mughal emperor Aurangzeb is “not relevant now”—assumes significance. He further remarked: “I think any type of violence is not good for society.” Ambekar was commenting on the Nagpur violence, which was triggered by aggressive statements from Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and Bajrang Dal leaders, who demanded that Aurangzeb's tomb be razed. As rumours spread, they incited anger among sections of the Muslim community, leading to stone-pelting and the burning of public property. More than 40 people, including several police officers, were injured.

If Ambekar's intention is to suggest that Aurangzeb is a historical figure of the past and that there is no merit in revisiting the issue to settle scores with the Muslim community, then his statement is a welcome one. In the past, Bhagwat, too, has made several statements that seem aimed at softening the aggressive stance of Hindutva warriors. In 2018, he made a particularly significant remark: “Without Muslims, Hindutva is incomplete.” However, this had little impact on hardcore Hindutva proponents.

Similarly, in response to the court order to investigate whether a temple once existed at the mosque adjacent to the Kashi Vishwanath temple, Bhagwat stated, “Why search for a shivling in every mosque?” Yet, soon after, in the run-up to the 2024 elections, India witnessed one of the most communal poll campaigns in its history, where BJP stalwarts openly said things like “batenge to katenge” (if divided, we'll die) and “ek hain to safe hain” (united, we are safe).

This raises serious questions about the implications of Sunil Ambekar's statement about Aurangzeb. One could argue that the RSS has been riding a ferocious tiger—one that thrives on hatred for Muslims. Taming it is no easy task. Yet, at the very least, there seems to be an attempt to alter its course.

Is the RSS genuinely committed to change? Let us wait and watch.

(Ashutosh is the author of 'Hindu Rashtra' and co-founder of SatyaHindi.com)

Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author



from NDTV News- Topstories https://ift.tt/LesXKrz